← Statute Engine case study

Statute Engine: Case Analysis Brief

United States v. Fischer
Generated: 2026-08-25T11:37:24
Document priority: CRITICAL
Counts: 7 screened · 0 not screened
Disclaimer: Preliminary research output. Every finding requires verification by a licensed attorney before any use.
Summary: 1 finding type(s)
1
CRITICAL
0
HIGH
0
MEDIUM
0
LOW
Finding Summary
no evidence-impairment nexus alleged (Fischer)1 occurrenceCRITICAL
Findings (critical first)
CRITICALno evidence-impairment nexus alleged (Fischer)
IssueThe document alleges obstruction of an official proceeding but no impairment of records, documents, objects, or other evidence. Under Fischer v. United States, 603 U.S. 480 (2024), § 1512(c)(2) requires that nexus; charges without it were dismissed across January 6 prosecutions after the decision.
Authority18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2); Fischer v. United States, 603 U.S. 480 (2024)
Pack severityhigh
Readingsno evidence-impairment conduct is alleged | evidence impairment may appear in facts outside this text
Affected counts
1 occurrence
  • COUNT THREE: “On or about January 6, 2021, within the District of Columbia and elsewhere, JOSEPH W. FISCHER, attempted to, and did, corruptly obstruct, influence, and impede an official proceedi…”
Per-count screening. Click a count to see every element checked and its findings.
LOWCOUNT ONE0 findings · 4 elements checked
Screened against 18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3), all 4 elements alleged ✓
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓act to obstruct, impede, or interfereobstruct, obstructed, impede, interfere, act to obstruct, attempted to commit an act18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3)
✓law-enforcement officer lawfully engaged in official dutieslaw enforcement officer, lawfully engaged, official duties, performance of his/her official duties18 U.S.C. § 232(3)
✓incident to and during a civil disordercivil disorder18 U.S.C. § 232(1)
✓commerce or federally-protected-function nexuscommerce, federally protected function, movement of any article, adversely affected commerce18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3)
Every screened element is alleged on the face of this count, so the pack raised no finding. Attorney verification still required.
LOWCOUNT TWO0 findings · 5 elements checked
Screened against 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1), all 5 elements alleged ✓
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓forciblyforcibly18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1)
✓assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfereassault, assaulting, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, interfere18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1)
✓federal officer or employee (§ 1114)officer and employee of the united states, employee of the united states, person assisting such an officer, uniformed se18 U.S.C. § 1114
✓engaged in or on account of official dutiesofficial duties, performance of official duties, on account of the performance18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1)
✓felony aggravator (physical contact or intent to commit another felony)physical contact, intent to commit another felony18 U.S.C. § 111(a)
Modifiers / references: 18 U.S.C. § 2, aiding and abetting (modifier)
Every screened element is alleged on the face of this count, so the pack raised no finding. Attorney verification still required.
CRITICALCOUNT THREE1 finding · 4 elements checked
Screened against 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), 3 of 4 elements alleged ⚠
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓obstructive actobstruct, obstruction, impede, influence18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)
✓official proceedingofficial proceeding, proceeding before, certification of the electoral college18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)
✓corrupt intentcorruptly18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)
✗evidence-impairment nexus (Fischer)not alleged18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)
Modifiers / references: 3 U.S.C. § 15, referenced proceeding (Electoral Count Act); 18 U.S.C. § 2, aiding and abetting (modifier)
CRITICAL no evidence-impairment nexus alleged (Fischer). See the CRITICAL card above.
LOWCOUNT FOUR0 findings · 5 elements checked
Screened against 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1), all 5 elements alleged ✓
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓knowinglyknowingly, unlawfully and knowingly18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)
✓restricted building or groundsrestricted building, restricted area, cordoned-off, posted, cordoned, otherwise restricted18 U.S.C. § 1752(c)(1)
✓Secret Service protectee presentvice president, president, temporarily visiting18 U.S.C. § 1752(c)(1)(B)
✓enter or remainenter, entering, remain, remaining18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1)
✓without lawful authoritywithout lawful authority, unlawfully18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1)
Every screened element is alleged on the face of this count, so the pack raised no finding. Attorney verification still required.
LOWCOUNT FIVE0 findings · 6 elements checked
Screened against 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2), all 6 elements alleged ✓
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓knowinglyknowingly18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)
✓restricted building or groundsrestricted building, restricted area, cordoned-off, posted, cordoned, otherwise restricted18 U.S.C. § 1752(c)(1)
✓Secret Service protectee presentvice president, president, temporarily visiting18 U.S.C. § 1752(c)(1)(B)
✓disorderly or disruptive conductdisorderly, disruptive conduct, disruptive18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)
✓intent to impede or disrupt Government businessintent to impede, with intent to impede and disrupt, orderly conduct of government business18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)
✓conduct in fact impeded or disruptedin fact impede, did in fact18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)
Every screened element is alleged on the face of this count, so the pack raised no finding. Attorney verification still required.
LOWCOUNT SIX0 findings · 4 elements checked
Screened against 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D), all 4 elements alleged ✓
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓willfully and knowinglywillfully and knowingly, willfully, knowingly40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)
✓in a Capitol Building or Groundscapitol building, capitol buildings40 U.S.C. § 5101
✓disorderly or disruptive conductdisorderly, disruptive conduct, disruptive40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D)
✓intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb Congresssession of congress, either house of congress, committee of congress, intent to impede, disturb the orderly conduct40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D)
Every screened element is alleged on the face of this count, so the pack raised no finding. Attorney verification still required.
LOWCOUNT SEVEN0 findings · 3 elements checked
Screened against 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G), all 3 elements alleged ✓
ElementMatched termsAuthority
✓willfully and knowinglywillfully and knowingly, willfully, knowingly40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)
✓in a Capitol Building or Groundscapitol building, united states capitol40 U.S.C. § 5101
✓parade, demonstrate, or picketparaded, parading, demonstrated, demonstrating, picketed, picketing40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G)
Every screened element is alleged on the face of this count, so the pack raised no finding. Attorney verification still required.
Citations not screened
Every count citing a statute was screened.
Deterministic analysis only. No language model contributed to this brief. Preliminary research output. Every finding requires verification by a licensed attorney before any use.